FAQs - California Insurance Claims

Under California law, insurance bad faith occurs when an insurance company fails to fulfill its obligation to act in good faith and deal fairly with its policyholders. This can include denying valid claims without proper investigation or justification, unreasonably delaying payment of claims, or failing to communicate important information to policyholders. Essentially, insurance bad faith means that the insurance company has acted in a dishonest or unfair manner towards its policyholders.

A first-party insurance claim in California is a claim made by the policyholder to their own insurance company for damages or losses suffered by the policyholder. In other words, it is a claim made by the person or entity that holds the insurance policy, as opposed to a third party who may have been injured or suffered damage as a result of the policyholder’s actions. For example, if you have homeowners insurance and you have water damage, you would make a first-party claim to your own insurance company to cover the damage to your home and the cost of repairs.

A third-party insurance claim is a claim made by someone other than the policyholder against the policyholder’s insurance company. This type of claim is typically made by someone who has been injured or suffered damage as a result of the policyholder’s actions. For example, if someone accidentally falls off the roof in your home, he could file a third-party claim with your homeowner’s insurance company to cover the cost of his damages, medical expenses or injuries.

Unreasonable “refusal to settle” means that an insurance company has rejected a settlement offer made by the claimant that is within the limits of the policy, without any reasonable justification. In other words, the insurance company has acted in bad faith by refusing to settle a claim that it should have settled. This can happen, for example, when a homeowner makes a claim and the insurance company refuses to settle the claim even when it is clear that the policyholder’s claim is valid. The refusal to settle may be deemed unreasonable if the insurance company is acting in a way that is not consistent with the standards of the insurance industry. Ultimately, an unreasonable refusal to settle can result in the insurance company being held liable for damages that exceed the policy limits.

Inadequate insurance claim investigation means that an insurance company has failed to conduct a thorough and reasonable investigation into an insurance claim made by a policyholder or a third party. Essentially, the insurance company has not done its due diligence in gathering all relevant information and evidence related to the claim. This can happen, for example, when an insurance company denies a claim without properly examining the facts or when it delays investigating a claim for an unreasonable amount of time. Inadequate investigation can also occur if the insurance company fails to gather information from witnesses or other important sources. Ultimately, inadequate investigation can result in an unjust outcome for the claimant, who may be unfairly denied coverage or compensation for their losses. It can also lead to legal action against the insurance company for acting in bad faith or breaching its contract with the policyholder.

A claim made against a business for injuries is called a “tort claim.” It is usually based upon the concept of carelessness or negligence, although it can also be based upon an intentional or reckless act. The person who is at fault for causing the accident is referred to as the “tortfeasor” or “defendant.”
Issues that typically arise in a tort claim involving a customer injury at a business are liability, Damages and insurance Coverage. 

Liability refers to the question of who is at fault and to what degree. California is a comparative negligence state, meaning that the claimant’s recovery can be reduced by the percent of his own comparative fault. The insurance company representing the business obviously wants to minimize or eliminate the fault of the business owner and maximize your degree of comparative fault. There may also be efforts by the insurance company to deny coverage completely. 

Under certain circumstances, a California insurance adjuster may be held personally liable for negligence in mishandling an insurance claim. California law recognizes that an insurance adjuster owes a duty of care to the insured party in processing and handling an insurance claim. If an adjuster breaches this duty by acting negligently or intentionally, causing harm or financial losses to the insured party, the adjuster may be held personally liable for the damages caused.

Insurance companies may delay payment of a valid insurance claim for a variety of reasons. One reason is simply that the claims process can be complex, and it may take time for the insurance company to review all the relevant information and documents related to the claim. Additionally, insurance companies may be dealing with a high volume of claims at any given time, which can cause delays in processing. However, in some cases, insurance companies may delay payment in an attempt to pressure the claimant into accepting a lower settlement amount or to avoid paying out the full value of the claim. This can be seen as acting in bad faith and is illegal. Nonetheless, it is important to note that not all delays in payment are evidence of bad faith or wrongdoing by the insurance company.

Yes, under California law, insurance companies are required to accept or deny a claim within a specific timeframe. For example, in California, insurance companies must acknowledge receipt of a claim within 15 days after the claim is reported and must either accept or deny the claim within 40 days of receiving proof of the claim. If an insurance company fails to comply with these timeframes, the insured party may have grounds to file a bad faith claim against the insurance company. Additionally, failure to comply with these timeframes may result in fines or penalties imposed by the California Department of Insurance.

In California, an insurance company’s duty to defend an insured means that the insurance company is responsible for providing legal representation and paying for the costs associated with defending the insured against any claims or lawsuits covered by the insurance policy. Essentially, the insurance company is obligated to provide an attorney to represent the insured and to pay for legal fees and other expenses associated with defending the claim or lawsuit. This duty to defend applies even if the claim or lawsuit is groundless, false, or fraudulent. The insurance company’s obligation to defend ends when it is determined that the claim is not covered under the policy or when the policy limits have been exhausted.

It is not uncommon for adjusters to lowball your case, because adjusters work for insurance companies. Don’t be fooled by how friendly or sympathetic they may seem on the phone. Their only goal is to get rid of your case by making a low offer of settlement. But if you have paid your insurance company monthly premiums, you deserve the best treatment at the time of a loss. As a homeowner, you can stand up for your rights and recover more money through the use of an experienced homeowner insurance claim lawyer in Los Angeles county in California even after taking into account the attorney’s fees. Always consult with a lawyer – DO NOT accept any low offer made to you by an adjuster.

The most common reason for a homeowner bad faith lawsuit in California is when an insurance company unreasonably denies or undervalues an insurance claim made by the homeowner. This can include delays in processing the claim, offering a settlement that is significantly lower than the value of the claim, or denying the claim outright without a reasonable basis for doing so. In many cases, bad faith lawsuits arise from homeowner claims related to natural disasters, such as wildfires or earthquakes, where the damage is extensive and the homeowner is reliant on the insurance company to help them recover their losses. However, bad faith lawsuits can also arise from a wide range of other circumstances, such as water damage, theft, or liability claims.

The answer to this question can be best illustrated by one of our California business insurance claim cases. Our client’s business sustained  earthquake damage. The insurance adjuster’s investigation revealed minor cracks and cosmetic damages in the property. The business owner, prior to hiring our firm, and after much work and frustration on her own behalf, received an offer from the insurance company of only $7500.00 to settle the claim. After asking us to represent her, we were able to obtain a settlement for her that was 20 times the amount she was offered prior to representation. Even after calculating attorneys fees and costs, our client still recovered many times over the original offer from the insurance company.

The most common defense used by California insurance companies in bad faith cases is that they had a reasonable basis for their actions or decisions related to the handling of the insurance claim. This defense asserts that the insurance company acted in good faith, and that its actions were based on the available evidence and within the bounds of the insurance policy. Additionally, insurance companies may argue that any delays or other issues related to the processing of the claim were reasonable under the circumstances, such as when there are complex issues involved or when there is a high volume of claims to be processed. Insurance companies may also argue that the claimant was not cooperative or did not provide the necessary information or documentation in a timely manner, which caused delays or other issues in processing the claim. Ultimately, the outcome of a bad faith case will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case and the applicable law.

In California, the genuine dispute doctrine is a defense that insurance companies can use in bad faith cases. This defense holds that an insurance company cannot be liable for bad faith if there was a genuine dispute over the coverage, value, or interpretation of the insurance policy in question. Essentially, the genuine dispute doctrine asserts that if there was a legitimate disagreement between the insurer and the insured over the facts or law related to the claim, then the insurance company cannot be held liable for bad faith even if it later turns out that the insurer was wrong. However, for this defense to be successful, the insurance company must be able to show that there was a reasonable basis for its actions and that the dispute was genuine and not fabricated as a pretext for denying the claim.

Yes, there is a limit to the amount of punitive damages that can be awarded in a bad faith case in California. Under California law, punitive damages are capped at either three times the amount of compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff or $1.5 million, whichever is greater. Compensatory damages are intended to compensate the plaintiff for their actual losses, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are intended to punish the defendant for their wrongful conduct and to deter future similar conduct by the defendant or others. The purpose of the punitive damages cap is to prevent excessive or arbitrary awards and to ensure that punitive damages are proportionate to the harm suffered by the plaintiff.

In general, insurance bad faith cases can take several months to several years to resolve through the court system. The length of time may depend on factors such as the complexity of the case, the amount of damages being sought, the number of parties involved, the availability of witnesses, and the court’s schedule. Additionally, insurance companies may prolong the case by filing motions or appeals, which can further extend the timeline. It is important to note that every case is unique, and the length of time it takes to resolve a California insurance bad faith case will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of that case.

An aggressive California insurance bad faith attorney can increase the value of a case by conducting a thorough investigation, gathering evidence, and building a strong case that highlights the insurance company’s wrongful conduct. This may include demonstrating that the insurance company acted unreasonably or in bad faith, pointing out any violations of California insurance law or regulations, and highlighting any evidence of unfair or deceptive practices. Additionally, an attorney may work with experts, such as appraisers or medical professionals, to quantify the damages suffered by the plaintiff and to provide testimony that supports the plaintiff’s claims. An aggressive attorney may also negotiate skillfully with the insurance company to secure a favorable settlement or take the case to trial if necessary to obtain a favorable verdict. Overall, an experienced and aggressive attorney can help ensure that the plaintiff receives the maximum compensation to which they are entitled under the law.

When looking for a qualified California insurance bad faith law firm, you should consider several qualities. Look for a firm with experience in handling insurance bad faith cases, particularly in California. The firm should have a strong track record of success and be willing to take your case to trial if necessary. Additionally, they should have a thorough understanding of California insurance laws and regulations, as well as the ability to negotiate with insurance companies. Finally, choose a firm with a reputation for providing personalized attention to their clients and for being responsive and communicative throughout the legal process.

The city or county in which your California bad faith insurance claim goes to jury trial will depend on several factors, including where the incident that led to the claim occurred and where the parties involved in the case are located. In general, the trial will take place in the county where the plaintiff resides or where the insurance policy was issued. Our law firm handles insurance bad faith jury trials in all Southern California counties, including Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and San Diego County.

It is highly recommended to call a California insurance claim attorney if you have extensive water damages to your house. Dealing with an insurance company can be a complicated and frustrating process, especially when it comes to water damage claims. An attorney can help you understand your rights and legal options, negotiate with the insurance company on your behalf, and ensure that you receive fair compensation for your damages. They can also help you navigate any legal issues that may arise, such as disputes over coverage or denied claims. With an attorney by your side, you can have peace of mind knowing that your rights are protected and that you have an advocate fighting for your best interests.

“No recovery – No fee” is a type of contingency fee agreement commonly used by insurance claim attorneys in California. Under this agreement, the attorney agrees to represent the client without requiring any upfront payment or retainer fee. Instead, the attorney’s fee is contingent upon the successful recovery of compensation for the client. If the attorney is unsuccessful in recovering any compensation, the client does not owe any fee to the attorney. However, if the attorney is successful in recovering compensation, they will receive a percentage of the recovery as their fee. This type of fee agreement allows clients to pursue legal action without worrying about upfront costs, and incentivizes the attorney to work diligently to secure the best possible outcome for the client.

Yes, a Los Angeles attorney can win a homeowner’s insurance claim in mediation. Mediation is a process in which parties to a dispute work with a neutral third party to reach a mutually agreeable resolution. In a homeowner’s insurance claim dispute, mediation can be an effective alternative to litigation. An experienced attorney can represent the homeowner’s interests in the mediation process, negotiate with the insurance company on their behalf, and work to achieve a favorable outcome. A successful mediation can result in a settlement that provides the homeowner with the compensation they deserve for their damages. However, it’s important to note that the outcome of mediation is not guaranteed, and the success of the process will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case.

If your homeowner’s insurance claim was denied in San Bernardino County, California, you should consider consulting with an experienced insurance claim attorney. The attorney can review your policy, assess the reason for the denial, and determine if there are grounds for appeal or legal action. They can also negotiate with the insurance company on your behalf and work to secure a favorable outcome. An attorney can provide guidance and representation throughout the process and help ensure that your rights and interests are protected.

An experienced insurance claim attorney can help determine the cause of your tile roof damage in a wind damage insurance claim by conducting a thorough investigation. The attorney can review your insurance policy and the specific terms related to wind damage, and consult with experts such as engineers and roofers to determine the cause of the damage. They can also request and review any relevant documentation or reports, such as weather data or damage assessments. With this information, the attorney can build a strong case to demonstrate that the damage was caused by wind, and can negotiate with the insurance company on your behalf to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation available under your policy.

Yes, an experienced insurance claim attorney in San Diego, California can help you get relocation costs and additional living expenses (ALE) if you had extensive fire damage to your house. Most homeowner insurance policies cover the cost of living expenses, such as temporary housing, meals, and other related expenses incurred while the home is being repaired or rebuilt. However, insurance companies may try to minimize these expenses or deny coverage altogether. An attorney can help you understand your policy, determine what coverage is available, and negotiate with the insurance company to ensure that you receive the full amount of relocation costs and additional living expenses that you are entitled to.

Discuss Your Case! FREE Evaluation